Mother forced to seek judicial help again to get services for her son
February 22, 2006 Media Release
 

(Raleigh, NC) – Today in Raleigh, Kathryn Reiter, who won a lawsuit in September on behalf of her severely mentally ill son, was forced to file yet another motion, compelling the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS) to do what it has been ordered to do.
 
Five months ago, Michael Moseley, Director of the Division of Mental Health for the NCDHHS, ordered his agency to make crisis services, which are necessary for safety during a severe mental episode, immediately available. For Kathryn Reiter and her son, the long months since winning their case have been full of frustration.
 
“The Department has tried to create the illusion, on paper, that they are providing the services to which my son is entitled, but those services just do not exist. It’s a charade,” says Mrs. Reiter.
 
Mrs. Reiter had turned to the courts for help more than two years ago, because the Department had not contracted with any mental health providers in the Western North Carolina counties near her home to help her child, Thomas, in a crisis situation. When he was twelve years old, and the psychiatric inpatient unit at the local hospital refused to treat him, Thomas was handcuffed in the back of a police car for the entire four-hour ride to a state-run mental hospital.
 
According to Mrs. Reiter’s attorney Erwin Byrd, of Advocates for Children’s Services, situations like these are not uncommon in the post-reform world of North Carolina mental healthcare. Two major goals of the mental health reform were to reduce long-term stays at costly institutions and to allow children to be treated in or near their homes. The promised mobile crisis units and local crisis facilities, however, have yet to materialize for most of the Medicaid-eligible children of this state. The absence of services thus calls into question the good faith of the entire reform effort.
 
“This motion is necessary because our client is entitled to these services by law,” says Byrd “The services have been promised to him, and he should be able to rely on them, but, after all these years and court orders, the services are still not in place. The NC Department of Health and Human Services should not be allowed to evade its legal obligation to this child.”
 
Advocates for Children’s Services (ACS) is a statewide project of Legal Aid of North Carolina that provides free legal representation to at-risk children and children involved in the juvenile justice system because they have been denied Medicaid, Special Education, speedy permanent placement and/or the opportunity for a sound basic education. ACS currently has offices in Durham and Winston-Salem, NC.
 
Legal Aid of North Carolina (LANC) is a statewide, nonprofit law firm that provides free legal services in civil matters to eligible, low-income people in all 100 counties in North Carolina through 24, geographically located offices in North Carolina. LANC’s clients typically have an annual income of 125% or less of the federally established poverty levels.

#                    #                    #

COPIES OF THE MOTION ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
_____
 
CONTACTS:
Lewis Pitts (Senior Managing Attorney, Advocates for Children’s Services, Durham), 919-226-0052
 
Erwin Byrd (Staff Attorney, Advocates for Children’s Services, Durham), 919-226-0052
 
Dock Kornegay (Director, Public Relations & Development, LANC, Raleigh, NC); 919-856-2564

 


Disclaimer

The materials contained on this website are for information and educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.  Also please note that Legal Aid of North Carolina does not provide legal assistance by E-mail. Contact your Legal Aid of North Carolina office or a private attorney if you need to speak to an attorney regarding your particular situation.
See our complete disclaimer.

Mission Statement

Legal Aid of North Carolina is a statewide, nonprofit law firm that provides free legal services in civil matters to low-income people in order to ensure equal access to justice and to remove legal barriers to economic opportunity.

 

Back  |  Top