The Bar's Ethical Responsibility to Children"

by Lewis Pitts, Esq.

[Note:  This article was published in the Spring 2003 newsletter of the American Bar Association Center Section of Litigation, Children's Rights Litigation Committee.]

It was empowering to read the article by Susan Cockfield in the Fall 2002 issue of this newsletter. Attorney Cockfield called for public education on the issue of how children are routinely denied the due process right of counsel when they have significant interests at stake.

It is so refreshing to hear a battle cry to take the maltreatment of children and their de facto status in the legal system as property, rather than as persons with constitutional rights, into the public arena of democracy and social change. As a lawyer for children, I see on a daily basis, what the National Commission on Children in its 1991 Final Report called "institutional immorality."

I, too, am shocked by the callous treatment of children in the child welfare system and the public health system. Moreover, I agree with the U.S. Advisory Board on Child, Abuse and Neglect when, in 1990, they called the situation a "national emergency."

There is a huge gap between our rhetoric proclaiming children as "our national treasure" and the reality of how we prioritize resources and attend to their actual needs. As a society, we need to move beyond rhetoric to rights for children -- due process protective rights for children -- first and foremost of which is the right to be heard through vigorous counsel.

The Model for Reform: Lessons from the Civil Rights Movement
A connection can be drawn between the way our system treats children and our historical treatment of African Americans and women. the parallel is unmistakable when considered in a legal context: each group has the grim distinction of being seen as less than fully human and thus not rights-bearing persons in the eyes of the law.

While African Americans and women enjoy equal protection today (in theory at least), it was a long and hard-won battle. Children are on the doorsteps of such a struggle today, and I urge that we adopt a civil rights strategy for this fight, such as was successful for abolitionists and suffragists in securing personhood status.

We must draw upon the rich history of creative lawyering, in tandem with superstructure and grassroots mass action. This raises the crucial importance of linking such litigation simultaneously with public education, organizing, media work, marches and other protected First Amendment activity. More importantly, the civil rights movement approach allows and encourages us to fight to end the mistreatment and abuse of our children with the moral outrage and indignation it deserves.

To effectively address the denial of basic rights to children, we will have to deal with complex and controversial things like economics, taxes and budget cuts, and campaign finance reform. We will meet resistance just as did Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. when he introduced a critique of capitalism and militarism into the struggle against segregation. But as Frederick Douglass said, "Power concedes nothing without a demand." We must build up the demand based upon recognition of the depth and entirety of the problem.

Promises Made, Promises Broken
It is certainly a "problem" when our government routinely breaks the three big federal promises made to children:

  1. The Medicaid Act promises early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment for children's medical and mental health needs;

  2. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) promises a free, appropriate, public education to children with disabilities, including emotional/behavioral disabilities so often present in childhood involved in the foster care system; and

  3. The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) promises, among other things, the speedy and permanent placement of children who become involved in the foster care system.

These promises of essential services are important for all children, but for court-involved children (delinquency court and foster care court), they are "make or break" needs. All three cost money, however -- lots of money -- to implement fully.

When doctors and dentists are not reimbursed fairly, they choose not to participate in the Medicaid program, leaving a grossly inadequate number of medical and mental health professionals who will. When parents do not receive early intervention with adequate services or an opportunity to earn a living wage, there is little hope that they will be able to turn things around and become successful parents. When children do not receive special education services that are tailored to their actual needs, "manifestation determination" hearings that are meaningful and fair, and appropriate transition services, they do not have the chance to explore their potential to become successfully independent adults. When foster parents are not given adequate rates and support services, it is unlikely they will be able to meet a child's many needs. When child protection social workers are overburdened and underpaid, they cannot even identify all of the children who desperately need and are entitled to help. In addition, children need adoption placement services. They need fully funded Head Start Programs. They need public schools that are adequately funded with reasonable class sizes. They need mentors. The list could go on, but most of all, they need love.

When these things are not provided, foster children are at even higher risk of delinquent behavior. They need a delinquency court system able to recognize these undiagnosed or diagnosed yet untreated disabilities. They need a court system seeking to rehabilitate that has appropriate rehabilitation services available. They a court system with adequate court personnel and facilities, and trained judges with the time and temperament to really pursue "the child's best interest."

Corporate Welfare Cheats Children
Yet, cycle after cycle of tax breaks, exclusions, exemptions, and preferences for corporations and the wealthy have resulted in budge cuts that hit hardest at the weakest and most vulnerable population. Health and human services continue to be decimated. The Three Big Federal Promises are broken. We see it every day.

How many hundreds of millions of dollars of deficit did your state have last year "requiring" such cuts? How much is predicted for next year?

Here in North Carolina, we had over a billion-dollar deficit last year and may have a two billion-dollar deficit this year. New estimates by the National Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reveal that state governments are facing their worst fiscal crisis since the 1930's.

Every service provider for children, even the many with hearts of gold, are rationing, denying, screening out and trying to justify denial of services. It is so easy for all of us, in order to keep our own sanity, to irrationally accept the system's cynical line, "there's no money in the budget," as though that is a cosmically-fixed reality. By doing so, though, we surrender the cornerstones of constitutional democracy -- self-government and sovereignty of the people.

As we know so well, most of these children do not even have lawyers to appeal the denial of essential services guaranteed under current law. Even in states like North Carolina that have lawyer GALs for foster children these lawyers only advocate their own "substituted judgment" for the child's best interest regarding placement and have no authority, training or pay to appeal even the grossest denial of Medicaid or IDEA services. Similarly, in delinquency court, the children have a lawyer to defend the charge in the petition but no one to appeal a denial of services.

Jane's Story
Most lawyers who work with children have seen a composite child, "Jane," interact with a money-starved system: she is allowed to be physically and/or sexually abused repeatedly at home because Child Protective Services (CPS) does not have the resources to investigate the report of abuse; finally Jane is brought into foster care but not provided with the mental health treatment she needs. Jane is not "identified" as in need of special education services despite all the signs and requests from the foster parent. Jane gets into trouble in school due to her emotional/behavioral disability but gets no "manifestation determination" hearing. Jane is suspended or expelled from school because of her disability-related behavior. While suspended or expelled from school, Jane gets arrested for possessing drugs or joy riding in a car or shoplifting. Jane has a lawyer to defend the "charge" but no lawyer to sort out and appeal all of the above broken federal laws guaranteeing services. The delinquency charge results in a permanent removal from her foster home and her transfer to a group home or a locked facility.

At any point in Jane's story, a lawyer could make a significant difference and change the final outcome. For example, a lawyer could have ensured that Jane received the appropriate mental health and special education services soon after her entry into foster care, thus preventing her eventual expulsion from school and involvement in the juvenile justice system.

Securing Justice for Children
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 13, 26 (1967) said: "...neither the 14th Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone" and that "under our constitution the condition of being a boy or girl does not justify a kangaroo court." While the court did not define "kangaroo court," we know it when we see it, and we see kangaroo courts every day for children. They are treated as objects of the proceedings rather than participants with the right to be heard through counsel.

The Greek philosopher Thucydides was asked when justice would come to Athens. He answered: "Justice will not come until those who are not injured are as indignant as those who are injured." Unfortunately, our collective consciousness, manifested through our government, our culture, our institutions, and our individual selves, is not sufficiently indignant or morally outraged over the maltreatment of children. Could it be because the general public does not know the truth?

We, the civil rights lawyers for children, know the truth, and we must step up and speak out. We must take the need that children have for lawyers to the court of public opinion. The goal is not lawyers, however. The goal is obtaining for children their inherent right to the basic necessities of life. Lawyers are the means to that end.

We need to share among ourselves our successes and failures, our pleadings/briefs, tactics, and strategies. Most of all, we need to infect one another with the enthusiasm and hope essential to be vigorous and creative, and not negative and pessimistic. We need to critically, but constructively, ask why we rarely have the opportunity to attend conferences with the theme of children as "persons" with rights and how to fight for those rights. We need to get back to the classic trial lawyer, pep rally-type, constitution-thumping conferences that will fire us up, teach us how to link litigation with public education, and coalesce our efforts into a united front. We need to build upon the focus on constitutional rights of South Carolina Chief justice jean Toal, who wrote in dissent: "...the state of the child in this country and this state is a disgrace...If our state and federal constitutions do not protect our children from abuse and an unstable family life in their formative years, then they should be amended so that they do." Greenville County DSS v. Bowes 437 S.E. 2D 107, 114 (1993).

In short, we need action consistent with the Preamble to the Rules of Professional Conduct, which says that lawyers are "public citizens with a special responsibility for the quality of justice."

Susan Cockfield has urged us to "change the dialogue in this discussion." Who wants to attend and/or help organize a small gathering of vigorous, fired up, civil rights litigators for children to do just that?

My E-mail address is Lewisp@legalaidnc.org and direct phone number is 919-226-0051.


Lewis Pitts has been a public interest lawyer for 30 years, focusing on racial justice, children's rights, environmental justice and participatory democracy. He currently is senior managing attorney for Advocates for Children's Services of Legal Aid of North Carolina in Durham, NC.

 

 

Back  |  Top


Disclaimer

The materials contained on this website are for information and educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Please contact your Legal Aid of North Carolina office or a private attorney if you need to speak to an attorney regarding your particular situation. See our complete disclaimer.

Mission Statement

Legal Aid of North Carolina is a statewide, nonprofit law firm that provides free legal services in civil matters to low-income people in order to ensure equal access to justice and to remove legal barriers to economic opportunity.

Back  |  Top